S
Independent Buyer Due-Diligence Dossier

Satyam Surya
Manhattan

Plot 63, Sector 34A, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai 410210  ·  Wing A & Wing B  ·  A fact-checked assessment of the 3 BHK quoted at Rs.2.09 Cr
All-in quote
Rs.2.09 Cr
Real RERA carpet
1,012 sq.ft
Effective rate
~Rs.20,650
Possession
Dec 2031
Satyam Surya Manhattan tower render
The bottom line

A buyer-side fact check built from two sources only: the developer's own MahaRERA filing (P52000079306) that you obtained, and public web data. Nothing here rests on the seller's word.

A carpet-based price for this flat at the building's own government-registered average (~Rs.15,700/sq.ft) is about Rs.1.63 Cr. You are quoted Rs.2.09 Cr — an effective ~Rs.20,650/sq.ft on real carpet — reached by applying a low Rs.10,500 base to an inflated 1,800 sq.ft "saleable" figure that is 78% larger than the true RERA carpet.

Legal possession is 31 Dec 2031; construction is at 0% on every RERA milestone; the developer declares no past experience. There is no scarcity behind the two-week pressure.

78%
Area loading
(fair 30-40%)
Rs.45L+
Over fair
carpet price
0%
Construction
complete
7
Marketing vs
RERA conflicts
1st
Developer's
first project
Prepared 28 June 2026  ·  For private decision-making only  ·  Not legal, financial, or investment advice  ·  All figures to be independently verified on maharera.maharashtra.gov.in
Reference

The verified fact base

Everything below is quoted directly from the developer's MahaRERA filing you uploaded (application REA52000167757 / project P52000079306). These are the anchor facts the rest of the dossier rests on — and the right-hand column shows where the marketing diverges.

FieldAs recorded in MahaRERA P52000079306Marketing claim (web)
LocationPlot 63, Sector 34A, Kharghar; Village Kharghar, Taluka Panvel, Dist. RaigarhOften shown as "Sector 34C"
DeveloperSurya Homes and Lifestyles LLP (Partnership)"Satyam" brand / Satyam Group
Past experience"Do you have any Past Experience?" → NO"2 decades / est. 2000"
StatusNew Project; all construction milestones = 0%"20% completed"
PossessionProposed completion 31 / 12 / 2031"June 2028"
StructureWing A + Wing B; 36 sanctioned floors + plinth + 5 podiums + stilt"G+37" / "G+34" / "42 storeys"
Total units211 dwellings + shops; 290 covered parking bays"210 units"
Plot / FSIPlot 5,064.02 sq.m; sanctioned built-up 28,505; permissible 34,505 sq.m"1.25 acres"
LitigationNo — "No Records Found"(consistent)
Title / CCLegal title report + Commencement Certificate + 4 plan approvals filed"CC received, clear title"
RERA escrowHDFC Bank, Koperkhairane; Format A & B filed(not advertised)
Est. project costRs.269.1 Cr estimated; land component ~Rs.90.1 Cr(not advertised)
every left-column value read directly from the uploaded RERA PDF (pp.1-7); right column from developer & aggregator websites.
⚠  What this table alone tells you

On seven separate fields the marketing differs from the legal filing — sector, experience, % complete, possession, floor count, unit count, plot size. None is individually fatal, but the pattern is the point: the binding RERA record is consistently more conservative than the sales pitch. Throughout this purchase, treat the RERA number as true and the brochure number as marketing.

Finding 01

The area is inflated 78%

You were quoted a 3 BHK of 1,800 sq.ft at a Rs.10,500 base. The MahaRERA apartment schedule lists the 3 BHK carpet areas as 94 sq.m (~1,012 sq.ft) and 82.58 sq.m (~889 sq.ft), with a third 3 BHK of 96.6 sq.m in Wing B. No 3 BHK in the filing is anywhere near 1,800 sq.ft. The 1,800 figure is "saleable / super built-up" — the carpet inflated by a loading of about 78% (1,800 ÷ 1,012). A normal, fair loading is 30–40%.

RERA apartment schedule rows 10, 15, 16, 23 (uploaded PDF p.4): Wing A 3BHK 94 sqm; Wing B 3BHK 96.6 & 82.58 sqm. Loading = 1800/1012 = 1.78.
Your question
"What is the exact RERA carpet area of this unit in sq.m, and will the agreement state price on carpet area?"
The answer
The carpet is 94 sq.m (~1,012 sq.ft) or 82.58 sq.m (~889 sq.ft). 1,800 sq.ft is a saleable figure that does not appear in the legal filing.
You should
Insist all pricing is quoted per carpet sq.ft and that the agreement states carpet area in sq.m. Recompute the rate yourself on carpet.
Builder should NOT
Keep steering you back to the 1,800 "saleable" number, or refuse to put carpet area on the cost sheet. That refusal is the warning sign.
Safe
A quote and agreement both expressed on RERA carpet area (94 or 82.58 sq.m).
Not safe
Any price, EMI, or "rate" computed on 1,800 sq.ft, super built-up, or "saleable" area.
Finding 02

The “deal” is just the list price

The Rs.10,500 base sounds like a discount. It is not. The published list price for the 1,040 sq.ft 3 BHK is Rs.2.07 Cr + charges; your all-in of Rs.2.09 Cr essentially equals it. On real carpet, Rs.2.09 Cr ÷ 1,012 sq.ft = ~Rs.20,650/sq.ft (or ~Rs.23,500/sq.ft on the 889 sq.ft unit). The building's own government-registered sales over the last 12 months averaged Rs.15,700/sq.ft; Sector 34A's transaction average is ~Rs.17,990/sq.ft.

BasisArea usedRateImplied priceSource
Quoted to you1,800 sq.ft saleableRs.10,500 baseRs.2.09 Cr all-inSeller
Published list1,040 sq.ft carpetRs.2.07 Cr + chgAggregator
Building reg. avg.1,012 sq.ft carpetRs.15,700~Rs.1.63 CrGovt-registered
Sector 34A txn avg.1,012 sq.ft carpetRs.17,990~Rs.1.82 CrGovt / 99acres
Your effective rate1,012 sq.ft carpetRs.20,650Rs.2.09 CrComputed

Gap between the quote and a carpet-fair price at the building's own registered average: roughly Rs.45–46 lakh on the same flat.

List Rs.2.07 Cr + registered-transaction table (SquareYards, fetched). Sector 34A avg Rs.17,450 listing / Rs.17,989 transactions (99acres, searched). 2.09Cr / 1012 = Rs.20,651/sqft.
Your question
"Your list price is Rs.2.07 Cr; registered sales here average Rs.15,700/sq.ft. Why is my all-in Rs.2.09 Cr, and what discount am I actually getting?"
The answer
Effectively none. The "Rs.10,500 base" lands at list price once the 1,800 saleable area and add-ons are applied.
You should
Negotiate from the carpet-based registered average (~Rs.15,700-17,990/sq.ft), not from the 1,800-area headline. Anchor on ~Rs.1.6-1.8 Cr.
Builder should NOT
Present the Rs.10,500 base as a "special discount" while the all-in equals the public list price.
Safe
A total price that, divided by RERA carpet, sits near the building's registered rate.
Not safe
An effective carpet rate of ~Rs.20,000+/sq.ft justified by "saleable area" or "premium".
Finding 03

2031 possession, first-time developer

MahaRERA records the proposed completion as 31/12/2031 and lists the project as a New Project with every construction task (excavation, plinth, podiums, slabs, fittings) at 0%. The developer, Surya Homes and Lifestyles LLP, answers "No" to past experience in its own application. The "June 2028" possession and "20% complete" claims in marketing have no basis in the filing. There is therefore no scarcity or deadline behind a two-week booking window.

uploaded RERA PDF p.2 (completion 31/12/2031, "New Project"), p.4 (all task %=0), p.1 (Past Experience = No).
Your question
"RERA shows possession Dec-2031 and 0% work done. Why am I told June-2028 and 20% complete, and what is the penalty if you miss 2031?"
The answer
2031 is the legally binding date; 2028 is a sales date with no standing. RERA + escrow give some protection, but delivery risk is real on a first project.
You should
Treat 2031 as the real horizon. Weigh the 5+ year wait + risk against ready-to-move stock. Get the date and delay-compensation clause in writing.
Builder should NOT
Quote a possession date earlier than the RERA date, or claim a completion % higher than the filed milestone (0%).
Safe
The Dec-2031 date written into the agreement with a defined delay-compensation clause.
Not safe
Verbal "2028" promises; any pressure to book now "before prices rise" on a 2031 project.
Finding 04

Bedroom-count vs. floor-plan mismatch

The brochure Wing A plate shows 2×3 BHK + 2×2 BHK; RERA lists Wing A as 1×3 BHK + 3×2 BHK. The flat count reconciles exactly (7 RERA type-entries = 7 plan positions across both wings), so nothing is missing. The mismatch is one label: the 81.47 sq.m unit in Wing A is tagged "2 BHK" in RERA but drawn as a 3 BHK on the plan. At 877 sq.ft it is the same size as a unit RERA itself calls a 3 BHK (the 82.58 sq.m / 889 sq.ft). Most likely a dropdown classification slip, or a post-filing "dynamic flat" conversion. Crucially, the binding number — carpet area — stays consistent across both documents.

Plan unit (Wing A)Bedrooms shownPlan room-sumClosest RERA entryStatus
Unit 01 (corner)3~910 sq.ft3 BHK 94 sq.m (1,012)Consistent
Unit 04 (corner)3~749 sq.ft81.47 sq.m (877) — tagged 2BHKMISLABEL
Unit 02 (inner)2~603 sq.ft2 BHK 66.6-66.8 sq.m (717)Consistent
Unit 03 (inner)2~603 sq.ft2 BHK 66.6-66.8 sq.m (717)Consistent
plan room-sums computed from brochure dimensions (Unit 01~910, 04~749, 02/03~603 sqft) matched to RERA carpet rows; 81.47 sqm "2BHK" is the outlier vs 82.58 sqm 3BHK.
Your question
"Your plan shows Unit 04 as a 3 BHK, but MahaRERA lists the 81.47 sq.m Wing-A unit as a 2 BHK. Which is correct, and what will the agreement say?"
The answer
Likely a label error or a layout conversion. The carpet (81.47 sq.m) is the same either way; only the room count is in question.
You should
Get the bedroom count AND carpet area for your exact unit in writing, and confirm the RERA annexure matches what you are sold.
Builder should NOT
Brush off a documented RERA-vs-plan discrepancy, or promise a "3 BHK" the filing records as a 2 BHK without correcting the record.
Safe
Bedroom count + carpet that match between the agreement, the plan, and the RERA annexure.
Not safe
Buying a "3 BHK" whose RERA entry says 2 BHK, with no written reconciliation.
Layout

Floor plan — which unit is which

Wing A typical-floor plate (the layout shown during the visit). Corner units 01 and 04 are the 3 BHKs; inner units 02 and 03 are 2 BHKs. Unit 01 is the larger 3 BHK (living 11'0×19'4 vs 10'0×16'9 for 04). Confirm the exact unit number against the RERA annexure before paying.

Annotated Wing A floor plan
Wing A typical floor plan, annotated. Source: developer brochure, cross-referenced to MahaRERA carpet schedule.
WingTypeCarpet (sq.m)~sq.ftUnitsNote
A2 BHK66.65 / 66.84717 / 72060Inner units 02 / 03
A2 BHK*81.4787730*Drawn as 3 BHK — see Finding 4
A3 BHK94.00~1,01230Unit 01 (larger 3 BHK)
B2 BHK63.5268430
B3 BHK82.58~88930Smaller 3 BHK
B3 BHK96.60~1,04030Largest 3 BHK
full schedule from uploaded RERA PDF pp.3-4 (apartment rows 2,10,13,14,15,16,23). Plus shops + 290 covered parking; 211 dwellings total.
Finding 05

Independent transaction evidence

Government-registered sales in this building confirm the real 3 BHK carpet (~1,012–1,040 sq.ft, never 1,800) and the rate trend. These are not listings or opinions — they are registered transactions.

Registered sales (carpet area)

02 Apr 2026 · Unit 2101 (B)1,040 sq.ft
25 Mar 2026 · Unit 1501 (A)1,012 sq.ft
18 Feb 2026 · Unit 3101 (B)1,040 sq.ft
13 Feb 2026 · Unit 901 (B)1,040 sq.ft
16 Jun 2026 · Unit 804 (A)909 sq.ft

18 sales Jul-25 to Jun-26, total Rs.26 Cr, avg Rs.15,700/sq.ft.

Rate trend (project vs locality)

QtrProjectKharghar
Jun 202511,60013,900
Sep 202511,30017,200
Dec 202512,70018,500
Mar 202616,55018,500

Recent jump is asking momentum — can be soft. Still below its own locality.

registered-transaction & price-trend tables fetched from SquareYards (govt registration data); Sector 34A txn avg Rs.17,989 corroborated via 99acres search.
Your question
"Registered sales here average Rs.15,700/sq.ft. On what basis is my effective rate ~Rs.20,650/sq.ft?"
The answer
There isn't a sound one. The premium comes from the inflated area, not from a superior product or location.
You should
Use the registered average as your hard anchor. Ask to see registered agreements for comparable units.
Builder should NOT
Refuse to share or reference registered rates, or claim "registry value differs from market".
Safe
Pricing benchmarked to registered transactions in the same building.
Not safe
Pricing justified only by brochure "saleable area" and aspirational locality averages.
Finding 06

Neighbourhood reality

The project sits at the southern edge of Kharghar near Amandoot Metro (Sector 34), in the "Upper Kharghar" belt (Sectors 34/35/36). Connectivity is a real strength; everyday amenities are a real weakness — which matches what you noticed on the visit. Independent local commentary is explicit: buy livability first, future upside second, marketing last.

Location map
Project location (lower-left, by Amandoot Metro / Sector 34), well south of the established central sectors. Source: developer brochure.

Strengths (connectivity)

  • Amandoot Metro ~100 m (Line 1)
  • Central Park ~2 min; Golf Course nearby
  • Sion-Panvel Hwy / NH-4 ~1-2.5 km
  • Navi Mumbai Int'l Airport operational (Oct 2025)
  • Proposed Kharghar-Turbhe tunnel & "BKC-2" park

Weaknesses (daily life) — your instinct was right

  • Chemists, clinics, dairies, daily shops still thin
  • Local agents put amenity maturity 24-36 months out
  • Recurring gripes: dust/air, water, Panvel Rd traffic
  • Mixed land jurisdiction (CIDCO / PMC / village)
  • Ready-to-move 3 BHKs nearby ~Rs.1.4-1.7 Cr
amenity, distance & jurisdiction points corroborated across 99acres, Dwello, Revaa Homes, ilovenavimumbai (searched). Map from developer brochure p.26.
Your question
"What is the land lessor type and lease term — CIDCO 60-yr lease, freehold, or PMC jurisdiction — and the exact survey number?"
The answer
Sector 34A is a CIDCO tender plot (RERA confirms Plot 63). Confirm lease vs freehold and tenure in writing.
You should
Visit the actual site (not just a sample flat) at a normal hour to test water, traffic, dust and nearby shops yourself.
Builder should NOT
Be vague about lessor type / lease tenure, or show only a sample flat and avoid the live site.
Safe
Written lessor type + lease tenure; a real site visit confirming daily-life basics.
Not safe
Buying on brochure renders alone without seeing the surrounding infrastructure.
Finding 07

What is actually clean

Balance matters: this is not a phantom or fraudulent project, and the dossier should not be read that way. The legal fundamentals check out in the RERA filing.

Verified clean (low worry)

  • Valid MahaRERA registration (P52000079306)
  • Zero litigation — "No Records Found"
  • RERA escrow account (HDFC; Format A & B filed)
  • Legal title report uploaded
  • Commencement Certificate + 4 plan approvals filed
  • Unit mix reconciles once one label is corrected

Serious — drives the decision

  • 78% area inflation (1,800 vs 1,012 carpet)
  • Effective ~Rs.20,650/sq.ft vs Rs.15,700 registered
  • All-in = list price (no real discount)
  • Possession Dec-2031, 0% built
  • First-time developer ("Past Experience: No")
  • Two-week booking pressure with no scarcity
Your move

What to do before paying a rupee

Consolidated message to send the seller

One written message forces every soft claim into the open. A straight builder answers it without friction.

"Before we proceed, please confirm in writing: (1) the exact MahaRERA unit and its carpet area in sq.m for the flat I'm buying; (2) the price quoted on carpet area, not saleable/built-up; (3) a fully itemised cost sheet (base + GST + stamp duty + registration + floor-rise + PLC + amenities + parking); (4) the RERA possession date and the delay-compensation clause; (5) the bedroom count for my unit, reconciled with the RERA annexure (the 81.47 sq.m Wing-A unit is listed there as a 2 BHK); and (6) the land lessor type and lease tenure with the survey number. I'll verify all of this on the MahaRERA portal before booking."

Go / No-Go checklist — tap to tick before paying any token

Agreement states carpet area in sq.m (94 or 82.58), matching the RERA annexure — NOT 1,800 sq.ft.
Effective price ÷ RERA carpet is near the registered average (~Rs.15,700-17,990/sq.ft), not ~Rs.20,650.
Itemised cost sheet received and every line understood.
Possession Dec-2031 written in, with a delay-compensation clause.
Bedroom count for your unit reconciled in writing with the RERA annexure.
Lessor type + lease tenure + survey number confirmed (CIDCO lease vs freehold).
You personally verified P52000079306 on maharera.maharashtra.gov.in (date, CC, title, schedule).
You visited the live site and compared at least one ready-to-move 3 BHK (~Rs.1.4-1.7 Cr).
No decision made under a "book this week" clock.

The leverage you hold.  You have a home and need not move on anyone's timeline. That lets you demand carpet-based figures, take the itemised sheet away, verify on MahaRERA, and walk if pressure replaces paperwork. A genuinely good flat that legally completes in December 2031 will still be there next month — very likely at a similar price. If a few weeks of due diligence makes the seller walk, they were never offering a deal worth having.

🖨  Print / Save as PDF

Verification statement. Every figure in this dossier was checked against the two authoritative sources only — the uploaded MahaRERA filing P52000079306 and public web data (99acres, SquareYards, MahaRERA portal references, and independent locality commentary). Areas and rates are rounded; carpet-to-saleable and room-sum estimates are approximations clearly labelled as such. This is a research compilation for private decision-making, not legal, financial, or investment advice. Confirm all figures independently before acting.